21 décembre 2021

Are you a professional photographer? No, I’m simply a stupid tourist! Ah! OK then…



Beware: the front picture illustrating the article has been taken in September 2019 at Lisbon. Other times, other customs!
😉

There were more simple times when people had still a tendency to rely on your words (that was a long time ago, it seems!). The problem when you are doing photograph a bit more seriously (without taken yourself seriously) is that people have defiant reaction versus your suspicious photographic behaviour upon them. In fact, it is not a new thing even if you are looking further in the past. Photographers tend to be intimidating simply because they are staring at people and things a little much longer then usually.

But is there a more stupid photographer than a tourist one? I don’t know why but tourist are often exempt of malicious intentions since they understand nothing about the world surrounding them. And if they are staring at something, it is only because they don’t know what they are facing. And if you add a « stupid » smile on your face, it is only confirming your mindless innocence. And tourists have money (any pickpockets of this world know that), and so, they have beautiful, sophisticated cameras that they don't even understand the basic use. So, in brief, no danger there.


Don’t spread the word but you may already aware that I have been a professional photographer in my previous life, and I have learned to dance with the rhythm of many photographic situations. I don’t do so-called street photography but instead tourist tapestry and everybody is correctly reassured. And you know what, photo opportunities have been falling in front of my (tourist trap) camera without really searching them. Sure, there is a bit of anticipation and experience in that but, chut! don’t tell them. If you add that you are speaking a tourist language (French, English, Japanese, etc.), you have the perfect tourist camouflage.

And please avoid those serious « full-flesh » camera models (also called full-frame) that, when pointed to the autochthone people, will provoke adverse and suspicious reactions and can conduct you up to the police or military stations! Being a idiot amateur photographer is so more beautiful and securing for everybody.

No, I’m simply a stupid tourist (of this life)! Ah! OK then…

© Photos Daniel M

14 décembre 2021

About ( compact camera) preferences...


"The way it is ..."
Bruce Hornsby and the Range

We like to photograph, and we like the cameras. It's maybe obvious but, in fact, it isn't that simple because there are so many possibilities and choices in photographic equipment, that it is often overwhelming especially for the most passionate ones. Over the past several years, I had the opportunity to try, and to compare many camera (and lens) models. Digital cameras were a new field the manufacturers had to fulfill. So, it was fascinating, to say the least.

Novelties have been always attractive for many photographers that are always interested to try and improve the tools they are using. And the technical advancements in photography into the last decades were amazing in terms of easiest of doing pictures and having outstanding image results. In the still photography field, we were privileged to assist and to profit all those developments over the years. Today we may think that we have reached a certain plateau that allow us to reconsider at last to have photo equipment for a more lengthily period of ownership and ... use!

My current photo equipment
The love of (real!) compact cameras, for good imagery, for decent performance (exposure metering, autofocusing, reactivity, reliability, etc.), to have access to an extended line of lenses and for a competent stabilization system (in-body-image-stabilization-IBIS) have certainly oriented my currents choices. Ergonomic and style also, I must confess. For me, a good design must be esthetic and effective.


If I feel dedicated to do photography on a specific assignation or subject, my preferred choice of the day will be the former Olympus (now OM System) OM-D E-M5 Mark III coupled with the M.Zuiko ED 14-150mm F4-5.6 II which is not only a very versatile combination but also weatherproof. For more specific long-range subjects, the Olympus ED 75-300mm F4.8-6.7 II will be a good complement (although it is not weatherproof). The OM-D E-M5 III/ED 14-150mm II is excellent for travel and outdoor photography and it can be used for interior and lowlight situations, thanks to the IBIS of the camera*.

For a more casual and discrete companion, my Olympus Pen-F** is also excellent because of its non-intrusive presence which is good for urban subjects and interior picture catches. Coupled with a small lens such as the M.Zuiko 14-42mm F3.5-5.6 R II or the M.Zuiko ED 45mm F1.8 Premium (a personal favorite since my first Olympus EP-3 model), the Pen-F is an outstanding rangefinder style camera model. These two camera models (OM-D E-M5 III & Pen-F) are using the same 20MP image sensor and the same picture interface with the consequence that you can predict similar imagery from both the OM-D E-M5 III and the Pen-F.***


I haven't never been able to make a definite choice between rangefinder (off-lens-axis viewfinder) and SLR (on-lens-axis viewfinder) style cameras so, ownership of both the OM-D E-M5 III and the Pen-F has been imposed by itself. It gives me the opportunity at a relative low cost to cope with the two different photo gear style. You can get a similar approach toward other manufacturers like Panasonic or Fujifilm since they offer the same alternatives into their camera line.

The cameras that I love to use are the ones that inspired me to do photograph and extend my picture quest on various subjects. On a longer run, the compactness criteria have always been a basic issue and time tend to confirm that is useless to think differently. The Micro Four Third image sensor format correspond precisely to that photo equipment philosophy. Some may privilege a more cinematic approach and will choose to work with the Panasonic Lumix models which is a perfect match in that (video) case****, others like me are more traditionalists by doing mainly still photography and will rather like the OM system line of products (formerly Olympus). At the end it is up to you to considerer your own feelings about the tools you like to work with.
___________________________________________

* Internal camera sensor stabilization (IBIS) has become an essential feature for me partly because I like the optionality to use non-optical-stabilized lenses (OIS).
** If you can still find one, just buy it!
*** If you ask me what would be my professional choices (in consideration of the more intensive use of the camera/lens into more demanding contextual situations), I will surely opt for the OM-D E-M1 II or III plus the M.Zuiko Pro zoom lens duet, 12-40mm F2.8 and 40-150mm F2.8 (with one camera body for each lens). But those professional exigences are now a think of the past in regard of my day-to-day concern.
**** Although the Panasonic Lumix G9, G85/G80 and G95/G90 (all weather resistant) have also excellent ergonomic and performance  for still photography.

© Photos Daniel M: OM-D E-M5 II/ED 14-150mm II; Pen-F/45mm F1.8; OM-D E-M5 III/ED 14-150mm II

07 décembre 2021

Insouciant Memories!





 Life has been good for many of us including myself. When I look the backward for this time, I am always fascinated by the chance we have as a special generation to be witness of such rapid human evolution even though it was not always for the best of humanity and its planet habitat, vegetal and animal. We as a so-call civilizations are highly turbulent people that have an often-deranging behavior in regard of this great universe that we are only beginning to partly understand.

During that period of falsely certitudes that we have developed mainly because of a certain technical advancement (industrialization, scientific discoveries and new methodologies, computer technologies, instant telecommunication, etc.), humanity never has asked itself about his own limitations and about the ones that surrounding them. But now we are so numerous and that we are aware of it, this unconscious brave facade is beginning to collapse almost brick by brick, and moreover the new insecurity doesn't guaranty that reason will finally prevail on the contrary, it seems.


Photography is basically an imperfect regard of humanity even when there is no people presence as the subject of it. It is a cultural expression of the past, the farthest to the most instant one. A kind of visual testimony of the interest of their authors. Every photographic part can be archived, summarize, analyze, and transmitted for future generation of lookers. The very significant of the picture can vary entirely with time and different auditors.


Today we are preoccupied people (at least some of us!) and confused t the same at a point that humanism seems to be very low in the priority list of this society. It is disturbing to have seen the shift from a collective dream with no frontiers where nothing was impossible to a very dark and narrow perspective of survival. Even the act of communication that was the obvious intention of link and reconciliation between us, has become the instrument of division and controversy. The dark side of humanity has taken the lead, and many are look for an emperor instead of a participating republic. The (non?) evolution of the photographic Web sites often illustrate this chaotic change.

Make your point, at first, can be understandable but it must be done with an open mind to be able to reunite at this very point of view the assemblage of all the others especially when you cannot really ignore them in this crowded world.

Is the selfie photo planet already a think of the past? May be or maybe not. We were told that humans are social animals (by definition), but in a perceptive overpopulation situation, what can be expected from individual behavior? Photography is also a social act of visual expression but now does the people are still willing to be curious and agree to not only tolerate but also to try to understand the differences? And this is where my "insouciant" memories leave place to apprehended worries.

_______________________________________________________________________

© Photos Daniel M: OM-D E-M5/ED 12-50mm; GX85/12-32mm OIS; G95/100-300mm II

01 décembre 2021

Nostalgia is for good memories!



 We are used to ear that the past was better than the present time but in the far back of our mind, we know already that is most likely never the case, that today give you better chance to live in better conditions that will be difficult to simply ignore. Photographers experiment the same attitude toward the analog past era compared to the actual digital world. And most of them have a limited if not at all experiences from those analog times.

I was born into the analog era and have learned and worked to use those photo gear that everybody seems to cherish today as collectors and, sometimes, as users. And many of them rediscover the "magic" of the film-analog but as every magical field, there is a lot of secrets to be unfolded before getting the "picture" you are looking for. Because analog techniques are more demanding and obviously much limited at the same time. And they are not particularly forgiving.

I remember clearly the first time I have literally seen a picture apparition from the developing tray of my school photo laboratory. And yes again, it was so magic! At those times, we were accepting any picture as extraordinary even if they were (very) far from perfect. By today's standards we will never consider them as interesting or to be preserved. If you want to be convinced of the complexity to produce nice film analog pictures, I recommend to you the lecture of these three excellent books from the American master photographer Ansel Adams, The Camera, The Negative and The Print.

Acting as a photo reporter during several years, I can testify about the difficulties and the insecurity of doing analog photography. With time, I have experimented many frustrating situations in regard of the picture taking contexts, film and print failures and imperfect results. The event of the the digital photography was an outstanding liberation for many reasons not only technical but also practical (especially for documenting and sharing your pictures) and psychological in term of security (you see what you are taking).

It happens time to time that some personal souvenirs are popping in my mind recalling the good days of analog photography but then I pick up my digital camera just beside my keyboard and fairly appreciate its instant availability and reliability to do and create beautiful pictures that I can look and share easily. Yes, nostalgia is really for good memories!
_________________________________________

© Photo Daniel M: OM-D E-M1 II/ED 40-150mm Pro

18 novembre 2021

Senses are giving a meaning of our thinking



Reality is facing our perception that translate into interpretation of our mind imagination. And photography is a physical extend of our perception by registering the image and render it over a fixed picture (on a support or over a screen). By selecting and editing a particular imagery, we are giving a personal interpretation of our surrounding world. That interpretation can be contested as any other kind of interpretation but the objective of sharing it remains for its impact.


Reality is facing our perception and how that can be different since objectivity cannot be entirely embraced by the imperfect looker that we have. And photography is not simply a repeating scientific experience, but it is also a creative one. And we are not alone to perceive living thinks, all other people have their own interpretation of this world. Even the most automated camera device cannot override the will of the photographer to choose his/her subject and the moment to photograph it.


Reality is facing our perception but what about our authenticity and integrity regarding the subject we have selected? Are we tempting to remodel it at a point of no recognition? Even though, is it not part of our initial perception and of our own interpretation? Is it a debate for us or for others who don't want to tolerate our way of thinking and representing this world?

The senses are the gift of our conscientious that is giving us a meaning of this life. Photography is only the extend of our expression and of our creativity on how we perceive this universe.

______________________________________________

© Photos Daniel M: OM-D E-M5 III/ED 14-150mm II

12 novembre 2021

Minimalist for the photographic lovers (and who want to have some picture creative controls)


 This is "the" never-ending quest in photography from the basic enthusiasms to the most reputable professionals and artists (although many of the last mentioned will never admit it!). At the beginning of this creative search come the digital image sensor that has been replaced the old analog film supports. Today modern image sensors are highly reconfigurable, and the final picture is fairly "editable" after the image first registration. There are pre-definite picture formulas that may fulfill your needs but also more complex functionalities for specific setting such as colors, tones, and other image definition effects (contrast, lowlight & highlight exposure bias, etc.)


Auto sensibility functionality have replaced almost completely the classic specific ISO setting, with the still available optionality to do it easily for some camera models but more uneasily for others. There is always the usual picture noise punishment associated with high ISO level use, but it seems to be less the case with the newest image sensors.

The shutter speed is also becoming less restrictive with the implantation of various stabilization system from the optical (lens), the electro-magnetic (sensor) and the electronic (in the image file treatment). Shutter speeds are more an exposure alternative to permit the use of a larger aperture or to obtain a long exposure or simply freeze (or not) a moving subject (or part of it).


The lens aperture is another story since there is a lot of lens aperture variations between all the optics available today. For example, using a compact camera model that have a small sensor have pushed the manufacturers to produce specialized lines of lenses for amateurs, enthusiasms, artists and professional photographers. In each case, some fundamental characteristics must be preserved such as specific physical dimensions and total weight, maximum aperture, lens construction in term of durability and use, etc. Deep of field, definition, video capability, bokeh and more, are among the factors that will finally influence the design of the today lenses.

All the camera manufacturers are observing each other’s and having a complete exclusive design identity for an entire line of models is now an obsolete way of doing thing. We can see that everybody is partially if not completely copying and emulating others’ ideas. This is the price to pay to get a kind of general agreement from the photo gear marketers of this Web Planet (which are not for many of them real active photographers). By standardizing the camera design, we also decrease the photographer’s differentiation in their work and theirs picture results. We are creating photographic stereotypes that prevent the original expression of the medium. Therefore, it is the outmost importance that photographers keep learning about the picture taking basics and try to understand their specific image impact.

_____________________________________________________________________________________

© Photos Daniel M: OM-D E-M5 III/ED 9-18mm; OM-D E-M5 III/ED 75-300mm II; GX85/35-100mm OIS

05 novembre 2021

The "Mono" Olympus Pen-F



With the redevelopment of the future ex-Olympus, renamed OM Digital Solutions, many are expecting and hoping a new version of the excellent but past Olympus Pen-F digital camera model. It is impossible to forecast anything solid about this potential new photo device but, if it is the case, we can only presume that continuity will prevail into the design and the operation of it.


Today you can still buy a brand-new Pen-F from the existing stock of the major photo resellers or pick a used one in good shape and at an acceptable selling price. If you are looking for a rangefinder style camera, it may be one of the two more sensitive choice, the other would be the excellent Panasonic Lumix GX-9.

If you go ahead with the Olympus Pen-F, you should not be wrong since that model is now a mature product that offers a solid Micro Four Third 20MP sensor performance equivalent at the one seen on the Pro Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II. Although all Olympus MFT models have the versatility to transform them into a monochrome (Black & White) camera, the Pen-F add a higher versatility to get there with a specific dedicated dial and offers an easier interface for the setting of the B&W color filter different bias (like during the analog era).

Digital mirrorless cameras with electronic viewfinder (EVF) are a blessing for monochrome photographers because of the modern possibility to confirm instantly and directly the black and white rendering through the viewfinder or on the rear viewing screen. I cannot emphasize more how it is possible to reinvent the past seduction to produce monochrome pictures and the Olympus Pen-F is a perfect tool to do so.

A unconscient direct relationship exist between the monochrome passion and some iconic Leica camera models which are, in a way, a strong recall of the past glory of the film-analog era (and may of the Kodak Tri-X 400 ASA film if not of the Ilford HP 5 equivalent). Many design features on the Olympus Pen-F camera body are, in fact, homages to that time period and manufacturer. On/Off switch that imitate the old film rewinding button-lever, front creative (image) mode setting dial that replicate the old slow shutter speed dial of the Leica F and G series, screw-in hole for the mythic shutter release cable accessory, just to mention few of them.

At the time of the introduction release of the Olympus Pen-F in 2016, this new rangefinder style camera model was the first one of the digital Pen series that fully integrate the electronic viewfinder into its camera body especially compare to numerous Panasonic Lumix models such as the GX 7, GX 85, GX 8 or the GM 5. And it appears with the passing time that will be the only one of such! Some controversies have occurred regarding the handling of the Pen-F despite its obvious search to replicate the ancient rangefinder design. Some had given initial bad reviews to later correct them to more sensitive and realistic appreciation of the Pen-F abilities. That phenomena demonstrate that the Olympus Pen-F needs a more extensive learning investment to be properly use and, in some ways, cherish by photographers.
The Olympus Pen-F is a discrete photo device that can be rightfully use with care in many more sensitive contexts like street photography, travel and casual situations. Couple with a small lens, the combination won't appear offensive or intrusive.


The monochrome factor


Once you have set the creative dial to Mono (located in the front of the camera body), the Olympus Pen-F is becoming a totally monochrome dedicated camera with optional to fine tune your black and white own bias via a specific monochrome profile or by choosing a color filter (Yellow, Orange, Red, Green) or by influencing the arrangement of the highlight and the shadow exposure. The amount of control available is diverse and fairly extended but selecting your own formula could ask you some documented experimentations with good picture comparisons.

Doing black and white photography is surely an excellent school for learning to master composition, contrast and gray tonal distribution. The subject expression is also a paramount element for succeeding to bring the attention of our audience. We have to remember that film photography was essentially a combination of colored layers of black and white films assembled to be projected. Color photography is another artistic school by itself, but the documentary value of the black and white photography is historical. It gives a sense of authenticity that color rendition has a tendency to occult.

There is a specific texture in black and white photography often expressed by the basic "granulation" of the picture. The different Olympus Pen-F monochrome profiles can accentuate that "grain" perception that mimic the old analog-film rendering.


The lens factor


Being a photographer is meaning you accept to be an intruder in a way or another. That can be highly intimidating not only for the photographic subject intended but also for the photographer him/herself knowing that many of them are often very shy people. Picture taking proximity can be a manner to establish a tangible contact with our subject. To do this a choice of a lens with a wider angle of view may be the right optic companion for the Olympus Pen-F, something like a 12mm, a 15mm, a 17mm or a 20mm lens. At the opposite, a longer focal length like the 25mm, the 42,5mm, the 45mm or the 75mm (extreme in that case), will preserve the intimacy of our main subject preventing an obvious interference by the photographer. A short standard zoom lens like a 12-32mm, 12-40mm or 14-42mm, can do the bridge between those two tendencies.

Our lens selection reflect ultimately our relationship with our subject as we intend to be close or far from it, as we want to interact with it or simply observe it at a distance, as we want to be a participant of the picture taking process or to be a more distant observer. It demonstrates the paramount of selecting a specific focal length lens to be used. The Olympus Pen-F is a camera model that replicate the "rangefinder" style of doing photography when the gear does not the center stage of the picture taking context.


Black and White photography without (almost!) post-editing


As mainly a black and white photographer for a good of my modest imaging work, I consider that many of the best monochrome studies are often done right from the photo taking session. With a camera model like the Olympus Pen-F we have the opportunity to "see" directly the monochrome rendering which is an artistic advantage possible by the combination of the digital photographic process and the use of an electronic viewfinder (or viewing back screen). By judging on the spot, the final imagery result, you have the possibility to further experiment and refine your picture production. It is a kind of spontaneous and continuous creativity process right in place and at the moment of photographing.

I am not very enthusiasm about heavy post-editing a photographic (file) except if it is the original intention of the photo creator-artist. You cannot really "save" a picture by highly altering it in knowing the technological limits of the digital photography. Further than that, a completely "rebuilt" picture will lose a lot of its authenticity even for the none photographically educated looker (again if it is your first intention to do so, it is perfectly understandable).

Photography is an art-medium of visual expression. We cannot discard the fact that for every context, for every subject, there is a full array of different interpretations that has been translate in the way a picture is taken, processed and shared. There is no real objectivity that can exclude the personal bias of the photographer even with a very scientific approach. This individual vision is the intimate way to see the world surrounding us and the photographer is trying to transmit it faithfully to his/her own convictions and believes to us. That doesn't mean that we don't keep an open eye to new ideas and subjects in other contexts, but this personal vision is gradually becoming our visual signature oppose to simply replicate the other works.



Some thoughts about the Olympus Pen-F

Many have seen the introduction of the Pen-F model as an homage of the Olympus legacy for all their innovative past camera models over the decades. The future only will tell us if the manufacturer intends to offer new versions of this particular model. The photo gear market is moving fast even if it stays a more "niche" one than a mass one. It is possible that OM Digital Solutions may not have the financial resources to maintain all the large product series offer as for the original Olympus company use to do.

In that case, the Pen-F is more and more becoming a kind of a cult camera model for the MFT format. Using it as an almost exclusive monochrome camera is just rendering this perception further. And the Pen-F is still a competent, reliable and classic photo taking device in 2021!

20 octobre 2021

Orderly, Oddly or not!




Everything in order, everything at its place, this is the world like I prefer to be in theory as in practice! If you know the fictional character Hercule Poirot of Agatha Christie, you understand exactly my state of mind. And contrary to that many may pretend, even (true) nature is in fact in some kind of order. There is a graphic logical sense that you can observe all around this material universe surrounding us.

The proportions are part of it. The equilibrium is a must requirement. Opposite contrasts are a necessity. Light distribution and detail rendering are fundamental quality criteria. The careful deep of field application is an essential exercise. In brief, photography is an orderly visual art. There is no such totally improvised world where elements are simply positioned by chance because attractions and interactions are the base of everything and have started right from the Big Band.

And order also means comfort, pleasing sight, secure state that we can appreciate every day and try to enhance every time we can!

15 octobre 2021

Time flies (over my head)!




Time flies over my head
Time flies over my years
Time flies over my life
Time flies over my accomplice wife
Time flies over my friends, over my family, over my love ones
Time flies over my mind
Time flies over time!

Overcast and stormy future times ahead

 


We are entering the fall season (October 2021) with more apprehension that we were expecting to have few months ago. Yes, many things in this world seem to finally be set on the positive way but many others are waiting to be addressed after the sanitary world crisis. For example, even if travelling is now partially available, we are far from the previous recent era of easy multiple destinations at low rates and open possibilities. Certain parts of the planet are still almost "sealed" and many people fear the uncertainty of the foreign health conditions.


Photography also reflects about that unpredictable future. For one, candid photography has become more difficult to realize and defiance is shared by the population as by the different authorities. The place for spontaneity has been replaced by a general skepticism again photographers, and those who want to be seen, want it only to their selected own angle of view. For sure the "selfie-planet" have not vanished in a glimpse of the eye, but plasticity has taken the place of ingenuity.

It is not hard to say that something is missing in the present photographic world such as its originality, its impact, its disturbance. What we are seeing today is picture product that have never been so predictable to match the suppose general expectation and part of the responsibility of this phenomenon should be assumed by the different plate-forms that are diffusing the photographic content. Nobody want to derange, and everybody want to be "liked". Hopefully, photography, in the past, was able to escape sometimes and in some ways the boring diktat of the general rule of beloved.

So, what is pending ahead for the photographers? We hope a better open-mindedness from our fellow people into the context of their surrounding world assorted with curiosity and desire to experiment instead of repeating the same preconceived ideas about life and its universe. Let's hope of this for our own photographic creative sake!



08 octobre 2021

I'm not a collector, for sure! (... or not!)

Photography can be one of the most accurate "time-machine"
over other kind of archival documentation.
 This is something I am not, to be a collector because accumulating things that I will never further use is not my thing! Take, for example, books. During all my modest (intellectual!) life, I have always been cheering to read new books, magazines, newspapers, etc. But I won’t invest to a personal library considering the obvious ecliptic of my various choices of subjects. Therefore, since a very young age, I am found of scholar or public libraries that are so full of different written opportunities to discover.

Working in the photographic business has been a good way to try several camera models and different photo techniques. And I did as an in-house or specialized news photographer, as an agent for camera gear compagnies, even as a photographic teacher or monitor. Almost all camera models have an interesting and different perspective on how to use them. This differentiation is forcing you to invest on a learning curve and to try getting pictures on your taste if possible. What this phenomenon of collecting is teaching us? First, I would mention modesty on a technical and creative points of view because it is up to us to be able to extract the real potential of a camera model even for the simple ones.

Paper has been the favorite photographic picture support
 with a very good potential longevity. 

Secondly, it emphasizes how the race to upgrade the photographic tool is never ended and how it is hard to follow this pace over the years. The big bang of migrating from the traditional analog photography to the digital era is a strong illustration of the technical photographic advancement that have changed many strong but past habits among photographers. Yes, you can ask you about the necessity to be involved in that continuous race, but we are always surprised that new technologies will enhance our creativity to new frontiers like, for example, the availability and ease to succeed using photography in low light condition.


Thirdly, there is also an esthetic view about photographic devices that you cannot ignore. Those "fashion" trends are present in our society for decades if not centuries. Man-made or designed objects are a true cultural expression of our human civilization. They represent artefacts that can explain the structure and organization of our living world especially for those in the future that will be tempting to understand our way of life.

If we have been in the past impenitent collectors in face of this world, we are now frenetic consumers that are literally creating a horrendous amount of wasted material that eventually pollute our fragile surrounding. By having no real long-term respect for thing that have initially fulfill our ephemeral desires, we are destroying our own evolution for an uncertain and none-definite future. Billions of cameras (as for electronic devices) have been discarded over the decades (especially the most recent ones) for many futile reasons outside our true needs.

History is often about a heritage of many things but the lack of historical interest in our present world could be scaring at a point that it may questioning the longevity of this human civilization. We have to pay respect of our past and invest more in collecting objects and representations that illustrate our historical path. And photography is part of it...

30 septembre 2021

The mechanical feeling: further thoughts about the Fujifilm X-Pro2



 One of the most distinctive features regarding the use of the Fujifilm X-Pro2 camera model, it is certainly its mechanical style approach which is illustrated by many analog style controls or dials. Many basic functionalities are present such as ISO adjustment, shutter speed and exposure correction dials, aperture and focusing rings, viewfinder option front lever as for auto/manual focus control dial. Even the presence of a shutter release button with a screw-in cable release option is typically a reminiscence of the traditional analog film camera era. 

Analog control dials are usually by stepped one-stop exposure value graded, compared to the more precise stepless electronic adjustment. This can be observed with the shutter speed scale, the aperture ring setting, and the ISO selector. And the convenience to set manually those dials is by forcing the photographer to get a better comprehension of the parameter choices in relation with the subject and its context. Automation often induces a less attention to the effect of the configuration used to photograph. Moreover, it is easier to directly set a particular parameter without working through control dials or buttons that are only reflected by viewfinder/live view info’s.


There is a bit of controversy about the utility of using an optical viewfinder (OVF) knowing that an electronic viewfinder (EVF) will deliver you a good preview of your final picture result. But EVF had proven to be more tiring for the eye of the photographers. An optical viewfinder in these digital days is offering a bit of a relief from all those electronic screens that are a constant part of your life even if you consider the less reliable framing accuracy of some OVF. Using an OVF is also a good way to measure how your film simulation bias are altering the "raw" picture rendering in terms of color, contrast, dynamic, etc. It may force you to reconsider that special image sensor configuration aspect.

Analogue control dials and rings don't mean that there is a mechanical link between them and the material functionality of the camera. For sure we understand most of those adjustment is done electronically ("by wire") and we cannot compare an electronic Fujifilm X-Pro2 to an almost complete mechanical parametric system like the Leica M (if you except the image sensor part).


Many Fujifilm X-Ts, X-H and X-Pro’s products have this mechanical feeling that characterize their series for years now. Beginning in 2012 with the introduction of the original X-Pro1, Fuji is now offering an impressive and expanded line of camera models and various X-mount lenses. Most of them respect the analog style presentation but as time is passing by, some of the most recent Fuji X-mount models such as the X-S10 have now adopted the standard electronic multi-function dial/push-button trend, and there are sensitive economical and industrial good reasons to do so.

If you like to do photograph in a simple manner but you still want to participle directly to the selection of the fundamental picture parameters, the Fujifilm X-Pro2 is certainly a strong camera choice to do so. Even though all automation versatility is present on the X-Pro2 and are reliable if you need to use them, on the other hand, you can configure, one by one, an exposure bias or a focusing zone of your choice that will open a different pictorial interpretation of your subject and its context. There are your image sensor configuration (JPEG film simulation or RAW), your sensor sensibility (ISO quality), your shutter speed (movement control), your lens aperture (deep of field), your focus point and, eventually, your exposure correction. Most of them have a direct control dial access and you can go further with all the menu functionalities or the other function push buttons like the white balance (picture temperature Kelvin control), the autofocus behavior, etc.)

Since the emergence of the digital photography, we have seen the reintroduction of the two camera design historical trends, i.e. the off-lens axis viewfinder (à la rangefinder) and the centered ones (à la single lens reflex or D-SLR). Each school has his/her supporters. Off-lens-axis viewfinders allow generally to stay more discrete in front of the subject, in looking less serious or as a pro-type of photographer, more face-to-face generous contact which is an advantage when you are looking for more spontaneous photography. The camera body design is often more slick, less bumpy although it will signify a less secure hand holding. At the end the virtues of each viewfinder type depend what kind of use the photographer will do with the camera.

Last remark regarding the Fujifilm X-Pro2 is its ability to be able to pre-select faster basic parameter without looking to the camera viewfinder/live-view. Getting an intuitive technical photographic approach save more time to look to the subject in its context with your naked eye and increase your ability to search and find different angles of view or to anticipate the scene time and space development. In that sense, the Fujifilm X-Pro2 is a very creative photographic tool.

More about the Fujifilm X-Pro2

29 septembre 2021

Fotonimous



Many pictures that have strong impact in your vision of this world and that we have seen during our life spend, are staying anonymous meaning we cannot remember their specific authors. This is often the case because the pictorial message is prioritizing first in term of information and reflection starter on its subject or object. The message overcome the messenger which is, in a way, a right thing because it prevents a bit a form of initial prejudgment that may influence the looker before the picture examination (That is why most photo contests will hide the author and the technical data during the judgement process). 

Yes, photographers as all other artists without restrictions have the right to be renowned for their work but it seems that there is a human tendency to "forget" to understand who, why and how a picture has been taken, processed and shared. To counteract this phenomenon, many photographers will sign-over their pictures creating by this gesture a kind of window that will interpose himself before the picture. Really, I am not found of this way of presenting photos, but some may feel more secure in proclaiming their identity so evidently.

The fact is that we are not owner of a picture subject even if it is done on a pre-arranged set-up. We have the opportunity and the privilege to be able to prolong a specific moment in time of a subject in a determined context. We agree that it takes a certain skill to accomplish that (doing the picture) and it is fair to consider the author contribution as a communicator that have an original interpretation of a subject but this the latter that will often "survived" further in time and will prolong the impact of the pictorial message.

28 septembre 2021

The pleasure and ... the pain!: the Fujifilm X-Pro2


If you are looking into my modest photo bag, you will certainly notice the contrast between the presence of two opposite camera model design and interface: the Fujifilm X-S10 and the Fujifilm X-Pro2. The first one (X-S10) can be called an action subject captor and the second one (X-Pro2), a classical photo composer. Although the Fujifilm X-Pro2 is an excellent traveler camera (urban, casual, intimate, etc.), this older Fuji X-mount model have the other interesting quality of being simple to use with a less extended interface menu to deal with. Only the absence of any in-camera stabilization sensor system (IBIS) may be seen as a disadvantage by some photographers (which I agree to a certain extend).

Following my usual compact camera criteria, the Fujifilm X-Pro2* have a rather big camera body alongside with somewhat larger control dials and function buttons that are making most parameter manipulations easier to do and secure. And many of those functionalities are cleverly done such as the auto-focus look (AF-L) that can be used to pre-focus the attendee subject leaving at the same time the front focus lever to its continuous position (C). Some reviewers compare the Fuji X-Pro2 with the Leica M series models which is, in a sense, an incorrect analyst because the X-Pro 2 is an automated camera model at first rather than an exclusive manual one (especially in autofocusing optionality).


One of the very specific features regarding the Fujifilm X-Pro2 is the presence of its optical viewfinder (OVF) that mimic the old optical viewfinder of the great rangefinder camera era. Although the focusing system of the X-Pro2 is using a complete different technical and hardware principle, some advantages have been retain such as be able to see outside the frame of the lens focal selected for anticipating the subject final composition getting a non-distracting view of the subject without any image sensor interpretation (a "raw" view if you prefer). For other photographers that prefer to preview as much as possible their final picture before taking it, the electronic viewfinder (EVF) can fulfill the task like many other mirrorless camera models. The EVF option is also a better viewing option when you are coupling a zoom lens with the Fuji X-Pro2. At the end, the Fujifilm X-Pro2 viewfinder options are unique in this market (interchangeable lens camera, ILS).

The Fujifilm X-Pro2 offers less than many other Fujifilm X-mount series models. For examples, no moveable rear LCD screen; no internal electronic flash; no (complete) Auto switch or control dial Auto position; no filter or special effect interface. But as a "pro" camera model, the camera body construction is suited for an intense use in adverse conditions.


The freedom of creativity is often opposed to the diktat of technically and modern photography and is one of the best illustrations of this dilemma. Getting be too much involved by the multiple interface (and parameters) possibilities can simply kill the enthusiasm and the motivation generated by a creative impulsion. It can also have the tendency to force photographers to replicate the algorithms embarked into the camera CPUs. But, on the other hand, automation is a good thing à priori because it prevents to be overwhelmed by purely technical challenges that are eventually stop spontaneity and enthusiasm to take pictures.

If you are looking for an "intended" photo in regard of the basic parameters of a picture such as image rendering, shutter speed, aperture/deep of field, composition, shooting moment, all of these can play a fundamental role to your final picture. But some of those technical adjustments may be less important and will depend of the context and of the goal of doing this particular imagery. The reference algorithms are based on a widespread image analysis of sometime thousands of photographic situations and the final parameter adjustments applied to them, but there are common bias that can restraint many constructive pictorial creative attempts. Working with a simpler interface camera to technically pre-set like the Fujifilm X-Pro2 opens larger original imaging possibilities.


In view of the newest Fujifilm X-Pro3, many of us may ask if is it still pertinent to stay with or choose the Fujifilm X-Pro2? In fact, those two successive Fuji camera models have a different personality despite their optical viewfinder central characteristic. And it is mainly du of the different LCD back screen design interpretation. In one case (X-Pro2), the LCD is a fixed one with direct visual reference that is been aligned with the lens axis. Moreover, the X-Pro2 LCD screen can be activated exclusively to review your already done pictures. On the X-Pro3, the LCD screen is movable but in an off-camera position which seem to me more intended to use it as an after taking-picture reference and its natural closed intended position is obvious. Time will tell which system will be favored if Fujifilm persist or not in that trend for future X-Pro designed cameras.

If you are asking what the best camera would be to choose, you may simply confuse yourself with all the different reviews, diverse statistics or even with the good-intended advice that will create a final confusion without any help to select a definitive camera model. The Fujifilm X-Pro2 is definitively no more, five years after its 2016 introduction, the flavor of the month. Its availability (as new) is almost non-existent now, but it remains a solid valid choice for basic reasons like its optical-electronic viewfinder, its simplicity to use and its obvious durability.

More about the Fujifilm X-Pro2!
________________________________________

* Nobody is perfect for us and certainly not a specific camera model. The Fujifilm X-Pro2 is a large size camera comparable to a Leica M10 (35mm image sensor format) in dimensions although the Fuji is weighing notably less and because of its "rangefinder" design with its off-center viewfinder, it is an easy camera to hold with your right hand.

The Fuji X-Pro2 optical viewfinder (OVF) is still puzzle me a bit and I have found that it is better suited to use it in conjunction of a fix focal lens. Comparatively, the electronic viewfinder (EVF) is the perfect tool when using a zoom (variable-focal) optic. In both cases, the autorotation (horizontal-vertical) info display is a very pleasing feature.

23 septembre 2021

One 23 fo(u)r all ! (1,23,4) : Second regard on Fujifilm Fujinon XF23mm F2 R WR


 Although it seems
more valorizing to spend (a lot of) time to select a new camera model, it is often the choice of the optic that will be coupled to it that may determinate the level of interest you will dedicate on photography. After all, the angle of view, the versatility and the quality of the lens chosen will impact directly to the satisfaction or not you will resent in evaluating of your picture results. Today photographic gear manufacturers offer you a vast selection of different optics, fix focal and zoom lenses, and it is hard to think that you won't be able to find your own lens sibling for your camera.


The Fujifilm Fujinon XF23mm F2 R WR is not a spectacular lens in any way except, may be, for its compactness and its optical qualities. This lens model is part of an unofficial line of small F2-2.8 Fujinon fix focal lenses that include among others the XF16mm F2.8 R WR, the XF35mm F2 R WR and the XF50mm F2 R WR which are all small optics with the weather resistant feature. My only design critic is for not having harmonized the filter accessory size of all these lenses which are ranging from diameters of 43mm (XF23F2 & XF35F2), 46mm (XF50F2), to 49mm (XF16F2.8).

With an angle of view of 63,4 degrees, the Fujinon XF23mm F2 R WR is a sub-normal lens by giving an extra wide view compared to the usual normal or standard 35mm (44 degrees) in APS-C sensor format. It means that the subject will appear a bit smaller than your own vision (naked eye) but, except for that, the Fujinon XF23mm F2 R WR is relatively easy to apprehend in pre-visualization. As a travel, street, or casual photographer, you can mentally anticipate his/her intended picture frame and compose the scene in its context without really or constantly looking at the camera viewfinder/live screen.

Focus/aperture(pre-set) rings. Many photographers that like to set manually their camera will always appreciate the manufacturer effort to preserve for them the control rings and dials dedicated to the photographic basic parameters (ISO, shutter speed, aperture, focus, etc.) On the Fujinon XF23mm F2 R WR, a large focusing ring (with a smooth turning resistance) and a true aperture ring are offering a positive and manual access to these settings if you want to do so.


Autofocus ability. The autofocus mechanism of the Fujinon XF23mm F2 is silent and fast in almost any type of subject contexts although the focusing accuracy can depend on which camera model you will couple the lens.

A maximum aperture of utility (F2). Beneficing of a moderate maximum aperture like F2 on a modern digital optic is still an advantage over many "standard zoom" lenses that are rating between F4-5.6 smaller opening. One or two stops advantage can be paramount to use a lower ISO or a higher shutter speed in certain subject cases but the price to pay is that the Fujinon XF23mm F2 R WR is a fix focal lens that will ask you to be more mobile for composing your picture.

Weather Resistant, a feature of confidence. We all like to think about durability in regard of our photo gear. In this climatic changing world, things can get for the worst in a very short notice. Knowing that your camera-lens combination can withstand these adversities is reassuring and, may be, offer you new photographic opportunities.

Above average to exceptional optical quality level. At the end, the picture quality is often the most important factor for the photographer who like to rely on his/her photo equipment without second thoughts. The Fujinon XF23mm F2 R WR is part of the finest fix focal optic of their line of lenses. Color rendition and image resolution are at par with the Fuji "pro" lenses. Optical distortion is almost none-existent. A good minimum close focusing distance allows you to photograph smaller subjects but you must remember that is not a true macro lens.


To conclude: a fine versatile optic (with some limitations). During my various travel experiences the Fujinon XF23mm F2 R WR and the older Fuji XF27mm F2.8 R were and still is for the XF23mm F2 R WR, my fix focal lenses of predilection. For sure, their compactness and lightweight were significant factors but without losing any optical quality which is the key factor in selecting them. Discretion, predictability, and reliability are certainly assets for the photographer on the move whatsoever photographic situations he/she is facing. The Fujinon XF23mm F2 R WR lens is totally recommendable as a competent and very useful optic although it won't replace a true telephoto or a larger wide-angle lens which eventual addition could complete your photographic gear.

16 août 2021

On the Floor!





Could it be better to be on the floor,

And on the floor can we feel better,

With its secure surface which can stand the beat of life.