The Panasonic Lumix G95(in)D(eed): additional notes

 With the "new" D version of the Panasonic Lumix G95, it appears interesting to revisit this Micro Four Third (MFT) camera model as Panasonic have decided to maintain its offer into their current line-up (as for its predecessor the Lumix G85). The "original" G95 and its "upgraded" version are in fact almost identical except for the LCD rear screen that has been substitute in reason of, we can suppose, of its specific manufacturing part availability. So, there is nothing to add from our initial review of that model in regard of its basic characteristics. To know more about these similarities and sparse differences, you can consult this Panasonic Web page.

Is the Pana Lumix G95D a perfect camera? Of course not, but for those who are more familiar with the manufacturer digital offer and in particular in the video field, they have been appreciated for years even considering certain limitations like for their (infamous) autofocus system. Over the past decade, I have the chance to work with several of them (GM 5, GX7, GX8, GX85, GX9, G85, G95) and I was really impressed not only by their interesting ergonomics and interfaces but also by their picture performances. In one word, they are better devices that many may first thing.

The Panasonic Lumix is made in China and so what? Are you seriously thinking that because it is labelled from an otherwise manufactured country, it will be a real different camera? The answer is obvious especially for those if not all who are buying computer, tablet and smartphone products. Let's forget that "Ken Rockwell" emotional like factor to move on about the design of the Lumix G95D. The ergonomic is good to very good. It would exceptional if the covering of the hand grip was not so much "grippy" (like it use to be on the previous G85). No joystick to rely but the rear D-Pad is versatile enough to compensate this absence. We must mention the excellent focus switch located at the back which is far more convenient compare to the front ones from other camera models. The menu and the interfaces of the Lumix G95D are comprehensive and are an exemplary simplicity while being very extendable if necessary. In brief, the Lumix G95D is highly configurable and customizable.

On the other hand, many aspects of the Panasonic Lumix G95D are less glamour such as its Micro Four Third (MFT) 20MP image sensor, its limited 2.39MP electronic viewfinder (EVF) from in other age it seems, the already mentioned absence of joystick, its only one memory card slot, its older generation USB port, etc. If you are easier influenced by the the last novelty siren, the Lumix G95D will not certainly appeal to your search of the latest of the latest.

The electronic viewfinder (EVF) thing.

Sure we love to have on hand a very detailed electronic viewfinder (EVF) with a fast refreshing image rate and a high magnification not forgetting a long viewing eye point. You wont find these latest technical developments when you are considering the Lumix G95D. But what you will see instead is a proved competent and clean EVF sufficient to help you in manual focusing, an accurate color reproduction with no rainbow effect in the low light areas when looking at a high contrast backlight scene which phenomena you can adversely observe with some notorious "pro" models. True to say also that the Lumix G95D can generate a grainy (noisy) picture in very low light situations but even though it is manageable for the photographer (at least you see something...).

The (rear) live monitor (LVF) thing.

Unlike the original Lumix G95 (without "D") the TFT rear screen has been replaced by an OLED one which got a bit less resolution (1040 dots/G95D versus 1240 dots/G95) but have a better side view rendering. Honestly the difference should not be so noticeable in real life photography since if you need to have a better focusing view for specific works (tabletop, reproduction) you can rely on the optional image part magnification functionality. The Lumix G95D back screen is fully orientable and can be totally protected by turning it face on the camera body.

Hocus Focus?

Nobody is perfect and the Panasonic autofocus saga is raging since already a time ago in this digital world. Is it so bad as you may ask? Under specific situations with moving subjects, it is simply and entirely true. Moreover the viewfinder rendering cannot confirm or not if the focus is obtained which can be really annoying. The problem seems to be finally addressed with the introduction of the newest model (Lumix S5 II) that combine contrast and phase detection. But for the Lumix G95D contrast detection stay alone to perform the autofocus of the camera. Using the single autofocus setting (AFS) should be the best focusing option to select with the Lumix G95D although if you can cope with the limitation of the continuous autofocus setting (AFC), it can be manageable to a certain extend.

High battery consumption.

Battery consumption when you are using any mobile electronic devices has been always a strong discussion debate. The Lumix G95D battery consumption is highly demanding for the rather small Panasonic BLC-12 power pack. The solution is to have on hand sufficient replacements for the entire outing duration. Moreover you can add the optional Panasonic BGG-1 vertical power grip that will double your camera autonomy and will give you a better handling comfort when using bigger lenses or doing portrait (vertical) orientation pictures. However finding the original Panasonic manufactured BGG-1 can now be difficult and rather expensive.

Weather Resistance (WR) feature rules the game.

It is a common fact that electronic don't cope with adverse conditions such high humidity and furthermore with direct contact with water (especially with the salty ones). They need a more advanced protection that seal them from the outside elements. The Lumix G95D is qualified s dust and splash resistant (but cannot go underwater obviously) and can operate in humidity ranging from 10% to 80% as for temperature from 0 to 40 degrees Celsius (No, you cannot boil the camera!). Knowing that, the Lumix G95D should be a competent outgoing companion in most circumstances.

Versatility is on your own.

You can do a lot of things with the Panasonic Lumix G95D. It will be almost impossible to experiment truly all the possibilities of the camera configuration. In fact many of them may rest unused for the lifetime of the Lumix G95D. But the important thing here is that the Lumix G95D offers you many specialized photo taking opportunities as long you are ready to learn how to program them. So the potential is there for almost everybody. No, it is not a "pro" camera (the Lumix G9 is the one that Panasonic have designed for this intensive use) although it can easily do (within its limits) that king of work if necessary.



The quiet introduction of the new Panasonic Lumix G95D version have permitted us to revisit a versatile and competent camera model that is following a tradition inaugurated by the Lumix G series. Even its actual selling price is a strong temptation to adopt this digital camera model. Don't prevent you to try it and you may be surprised of its conviviality and performance.

© Photo-illustrations Daniel M

One picture at the time!

 A story, a subject, a picture at the time are maybe the very base of the event of photography two hundred years ago. In our actual "cinematic" view of present life, it may appear difficult to fully understand how the people then have a special approach for (still) photography. If every moments are precious, you have to pay attention to select the ones which you elect to preserve in particular for a future reference. The magic is that limitative way of choosing is also a visual testimony of a past moment that won't be back forever.

Digital photography with its easiest to perform and to share freely and at a very low expense, has downvalued the power of the picture itself by offering a way too much multiplicity of them. In the past, we have already experimented this acceleration of disposable imagery with the more available photographic (people) press expansion since at least 75 years ago. So, the photographic digital introduction is not the only factor of this "visual" depreciation. At large and cheap public communications like the Internet or the mobile revolution are contributing to this phenomena.

Can we go back to the bucolic (in our minds only) past and reinvent a future with less frenetic pace of life? No, and we already know this as a fact that evolution never turn back even if many insecure people would want to do it with despair. This wheel is turning forward only but can change course for many reasons or causes that are difficult to apprehend as the prediction games have learned to us.

What we can avoid today is may be the lazy replication of past photography in order to get a maximum positive appreciations (likes) from everybody. Photography should be provocative and instructive for those who are looking at. And originality must prevail over repetitive multiplicity.

Photo Daniel M: Panasonic Lumix G95 / Vario G 14-140mm F3.5-5.6 II Power OIS 

Half of humanity is missing... (in marketing photographic gear)

 It is a question that I am asking myself since the beginning of my photographic interest: where is the feminine half part of humanity in your photographic universe? And may be the ones to blame first are the photo gear manufacturers that are strongly male centrist enterprises that have concentrate their marketing effort to a masculine customer declination for decades. That cannot be forget in any way especially knowing they maintain that behavior at this very moment in 2023! It is simply not acceptable.

Women have produced over the past two hundred years of photographic history, major creative artists, journalists and technicians, a fact that cannot be deny. And we, the males, beside them, have a duty to reintroduce the women contingency into a more inclusive photo planet. There will be no real equity as long women don't have the same access to industrial and marketing levers that are define our photographic gear world.

It must begin by the beginning with not only from these highly guilty photo gear manufacturers (Eh! Look to all those "Ambassadors" lineup almost exclusively male but with the noticeable exception of Panasonic Lumix, I must underline) and that obvious correction cannot rely only on the female group pressure, it must be a concerted effort. Today nobody really contest the female presence in specialized photographic fields such as in photojournalism, in studio work, in the fashion industry or in the commercial segments. Women are present everywhere but in view of many actual backward tendencies around the world in regard of woman rights, it is still a very deep preoccupation to still address.

Photo gear manufacturers are simply ignoring the female factor especially for the design, the fabrication and the marketing of their product but they have to amend themselves in all those perspectives. And, as male photographic enthusiasts, we have to encourage those ones who are fulfilling this task with sincerity and serenity. After all, together, ether females or males, we are the constructive parts of all humanity.

Photo Daniel M: Fujifilm X-S10 / Fujinon XC50-230mm F4.8-6.7mm II OIS

Authenticity versus Creativity (in Photography) and the AI menace.

 Is it really a new debate? Certainly not! Manipulation of photographic pictures have started at the very beginning of the medium. So, there is no reason to be so deeply shock to learn that a"false" or an " enhanced" or a "recreated" picture is part of our public or private visual space or screen. It can be glamour, amazing, disbelieved or simple bad tasted but there are a cultural expression that we cannot ignore.

Now there is also and always the same old justification to manipulation under the creative free expression. That can be understandable as long it will or it has never became a misleading attempt to abuse people and oriente them to adverse reactions that, on normal (and authentic) circonstances, will be highly condamnable. Sure some will say and pretend that in being critical will prevent the problem BUT being critical is not as easy as these "some" may think and in particular for these "some" that aren't many times in fact.

There is no limits to impose to creativity as for counter-creativity ("no pictures are good" or "everything have been done"). But authenticity depends greatly on personal and societal integrity, a human quality very rare to encounter these days considering the people individual agenda. Integrity is asking for open mind and a certain amount of intellectual generosity.

We have learned that artificial intelligence (i.e., none human) or AI may produce artificial pictures that cannot be distinguished from the reality. Although we may emphasize the technical performance, it seems that plausibility and counter-verification have to be applied in any case especially when these pictures seems in contradiction with our previous knowledge of the subject and its context. In one sentence, being critical is simply being lucid.

At the end, we cannot deny that creativity stays an important part of the photographic process. It is up to us to stay conscientious about the limits or the out-limits that this very imaging process represent in face of a "raw" reality of ours.

Photo Daniel M: Panasonic Lumix GM5 / G Vario 12-32mm F3.5-5.6 OIS

2023: De profundis on Photography or the Modern Mind Segmentation (MMS)

 Surfing on the photographic enthusiasm web planet, you may encounter what it seems a growing trend of people for whom photography is facing a dead lock. For them photography as a documentary purpose or an educative or entertaining art expression doesn't interest us anymore. We have trans-passed the "Rubicon" where pictures are simply became an almost unnoticeable decorative tapestry with no real impact in our selfish life. We are facing a sentiment of vast useless identity. WHY DOING PHOTOGRAPHY TODAY? To whom it can still be addressed or who can be still interested to look at?

In becoming an hardware society in terms of technology applications (softwares are part of it), we gradually have evacuated the basic motivation of doing photography which is not only a communication channel but also the expression of our deep perception of the world. In one word the messenger has surpassed the message. The technique has completely overwhelmed the subject. And now after all those years and decades of stacking technical developments and configuring algorithms based on past doing, we are trialling about what can be done more to get original and provoking content.

Part of this no or less "interest" problem is us. Are we really interest about our surrounding universe or have we "retro-evolute" to our original foetal matrices? We know that the future will be challenging individually, socially and collectively but we simply refuse to face it. In place we try to delegate our duty to some others that are controlling more and more our society. And photography should testify of those changes but are we still opened to look at it? In fact reacting is not so easy to perform for anybody except may be for special extroverted persons but in face of these alarming people, we are highly suspicious or, worse, totally blind or indifferent.

The question may be to ask ourselves if photography as a visual expression is still as significant as it uses to be in the past? The answer might be found first in ourselves attitude toward our planet and people.

Photo Daniel M: Fujifilm X-E3 / Fujinon XF27mm F2.8